A good degree of what is behaviorally characteristic of the chimpanzee would be relevant to a definition of myself as human if the homo-sapiens were the first, the last and the foremost in my definition of myself. I am 98% identical in DNA with our primate brothers, the chimps, as are all homo-sapiens. I would mark nothing distinct by being human from being homo-sapiens. The terms would be synonymous, and with the way our culture thinks rhetorically today, these synonyms would be interchangeable in all contexts. What is good for homo-sapiens is good for human. Do you think all those missionaries who were propogating the missionary position had any idea thay were also sponsoring the monkey way?
I once saw the Sistine Chapel depiction of the Creation of Adam. It was a revelation to me in the critical distinction between human nature and homo-sapiens nature. The homo-sapiens is an evolutionary contingency from the…
View original post 421 more words